Last Friday, the internet nearly melted as almost three dozen online wine writers, wine bloggers, met online to taste and tweet about five wines from Bordeaux.

Using the hashtag #PlanetBordeaux, each tweeted comment was viewable in a stream, and tasters were able to enter their comments from the tastelive.com/planetbordeaux site created for the online tasting event.

Soon the cries of “hey, who do I have to sleep with to get in on this,” and “what about me?” could be read across the webs as wine bloggers without the good fortune to have been initially chosen by Michael Wangbickler of Balzac Communications & Marketing to taste in this highly successful educational promotion for Planet Bordeaux worked to be included in future tasting events.

Today, I’ll give you my review of the third wine tasted on Friday, and then share the comments from my fellow wine bloggers.

Château de Terrefort-Quancard 2008

My review:

A Merlot/Cabernet Sauvignon blend. Unsurpringly, this third red wine from Bordeaux France is also reddish purple in the glass. Even with decanting, this wine is tight, but what nose notes are showing are loamy, dank, earthy mushroom with spice and red fruit. The mouth is cherry and raspberry, with herb and mineral. The wine is blunt, with and abruptly short finish.

Others wrote:

I’m really glad I gave these 1.5 hrs. w/oxygen. Still big backbone of acidity

It really needs some air, time. Tannin dominates right now.

Should have decanted the Terrefort-Quancard… not open yet

mushrooms immediately on the nose

Chateau de Terrefort is 64% merlot, 36 cab. Fermented in concrete. 70k bottles (not cases :p)

yeah, super glad I decanted these. TTL often forgets to suggest when to decant…crucial if u ask me.

Noted. Thanks! Vinturi, anyone?

liking the forest floor ‘shroom nose on ’08 Terrefort-Quancard.

more limestone soils

Terrefort smells like…. hmm… nothing? Nothing at all?

tightly wound with chalky tannins and slightly bitter. First two were more friendly for this American palate.

More earthy, mineral nose up front, a touch of red fruit riding in the back-seat.

I get pencil lead (the big fat primary ones), forest floor, and dried cherries

I also get a grandmother’s attic hat box as it opens up.

appropriate. mushroomy, earthy, minerality.

red fruit, razzberry, (with a z), hint of earth.

like a mushroom raspberry salad

Definitely the earthiest of the wines we have tried so far. i’d pair food as I would with a Pinot Noir in some cases

Agree on pencil lead, dust, smells a bit hot.

Youngish, lasting, tannins, but very interesting wine. What’s the price point?

Hellz yes….pencil lead fo’ shizzle.

At first taste, this reminded us of a Pinot Noir

reminds me of Eddie Munster,a cute little flavor monster with a bit of bite

Quancard is one house I’ve had before and liked. But this one isn’t doing it for me structurally or flavor-wise.

aromatically challenged.

Terrefort-quancard is awesome!

little bit of funk hiding behind spices and red mike n ike’s

i’m getting some indian spice, maybe cardamom.

I mean, the Terrefort tastes really nice. Good acidity, but it’s barely got any nose to this guy

Good bit o’ tannin on the mouthfeel

I get more going on on the palate than the nose. Can’t wait to revisit in a few hours.

I dig the loam there too

Château de Terrefort-Quancard 08 finding nose/palate conflicting

Yep, seems like this one needs a few minutes to open up.

It’s growing on me the longer it breathes.

This wine seems to be opening up nicely in the Riedel Vinum Bordeaux glass.

Yikes seems tight and tart. Time in the glass please

I think it’s only aromatically challenged if you didn’t decant. For me it’s got a nose and a half.

The 2008 Terrefort-Quancard is definitely earthy; I get forest floor, tobacco, dry fruit, but not a long finish.

thinking these will be better tomorrow night after some time out…

rather tart for me- rhubarb, cherries, white pepper, bubble-gum and chalk dust.

I decanted for an hour. Barely anything. Eh, different noses, diff. bottles. Whatcha gonna do?

I do have 2 say the tannins are a bit… much. I’d like to try it again tomorrow & try another bottle next year as well!

very awkward finish for me, I’d have to give it a major pass – for my palate.

Lot’s of interesting & different comments about aromas, tastes, in the Château de Terrefort-Quancard 2008. Terroir, peeps?

gonna try it again tomorrow and see if I like it better

this wine needs a nice slab of beef to tame those tannins

time + beef

The Terrefort Qunacard is roughly $14

 

Yesterday, I shared what I thought of a 2006 Bordeaux Merlot, and we looked at what dozens of other wine bloggers had to say about the same wine when they tasted it at the same time in a virtual live tasting sponsored by Planet Bordeaux and organized by Michael Wangbickler of Balzac Communicatons.
Today we look at a Bordeaux blend of Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot in the Château de Lugagnac 2008.
Besides the color, a nice dark red wine color, the first thing I took note of is the nose; the Lugagnac features a strongly earthy nose with hits of smoke, cherry and oak. The mouth is berry, cherry, herb and oak. This really is a good food wine and would show differently when paired with different foods. Nice clean tapering finish. A nice drinkable wine.
My fellow online wine writers had this to say:

cherries and dark loamy earth

Lugagnac takes a more serious tone.

Not as keen on the Lugagnac. All the smoke on the finish wipes out the fruit.

Hello Barn-yard and burnt blackberries! – LOVE IT! :)

lacks the structure and acidity of La Gatte

more cocoa, some herbal notes make it legit cab/merlot blend. Long finish. Who needs big fruit?

My geeky research tells me that 08= a wet spring & dull, damp summer. However, nice weather Sept-Oct “saved the day.”

softer, yes. But really drinkable. Mocha and cherry.

Nice red fruit up front, tailing off to a mineral & gentle toasty character w/ a drying finish.

Love the funk and smoke

Great acidity

50% merlot, 50% cab. Deep red, vibrant color

I think Lugagnac has a range of tannins that promise further development vs. the fruity Butte.

ripe red and black fruits, herbs on nose — black currant, hint of minerality on palate

dang! Lugagnac WAY more earthy. More oak. There’s the Cab Franc (before I look at the notes. Puttin’ it out there!)

I wanna know what the fuck “Merlot Noir” is tho…that’s what is says on the sheet. Is there “Merlot Blanc”?

They use it more than once so I assume not a typo.

what is merlot noir as opposed to merlot?

cherry taste, very strong aroma on nose…

Very rich finish, like smoky butterscotch

burnt earth, cocoa, some fruit. Surprisingly hot for only 13.5%. Grippy tannins.

black pepper, blackberry, beef jerky, smoked cedar.

whoa dose of herbs big time on this, way more aromatic than wine #1.

64% Merlot, 36% Cabernet Sauvignon, right?

Yea, basically, with a hnt of PV.

the tasting sheet says 50/50 merlot and cab.

crap. Really?! No Cab Franc in the Lugagnac?? Coulda fooled me

the sheet shows 50/50m which is right?

No Franc. :)

ya but btl says P.V. too

yeah, I put the Cab Franc out there too, only to be embarrassed by my stupid nose

I think this Lugagnac is going to get better & better as the bottle opens

Definitely mocha, and sweeter fruits, but fairly one-dimensional. Not a lot of change from attack to finish.

Loved the first but love this one even more. Complexity that the first lacked.

I get rose petals in an old cedar box on the nose. Softly elegant. with a bit of spice on the finish. great mouthfeel!

I don’t care what anyone says: herbal/green/pyrazines are part of the varietal profile of the Cabs (and even merlot.)

finally! there’s nothing wrong with some herbs in the mix, even some green peppers.

lighter all around,bit of fresh pressed linen in this, oh wait I’m smelling the table cloth I think

Loved the first but love this one even more. Complexity that the first lacked.

Lovin the cedar-soaked-leather strips.

I love the tannins on this one… I love the slight peppery spiciness on this.

spicy medium tannins and soft finish

merlot/cab 110k cases. Nose is dusty, red fruit as it opens. tad herbal.

interestingly the sheet says 100K BOTTLES not cases…hmmm.

apologies 100k bottles not cases.

might be better with time, but for now it’s not drinking as well as the La Butte for me

did I just open the spice cabinet? What is that?

Could swear this had some cab franc….hint of veggie green.

French winemakers need to stop using Babelfish to translate backlabels.

Or use it correctly. French to Mandarin Chinese back to French and then into English

I’m liking the smooth balance of the Chat de Lugagnac. Nice rose aroma

the 2008 Chateau de Lugagnac is more earthy to my taste w nice tannins, good finish

Everyone thinks green is limited to Cab Franc. Poor cab franc, pyrazine scapegoat.

Anyone got a price on the Lugagnac?

$13ish, I think.

Lugagnac is roughly $16 per bottle retail.

$16 retail

Thats a reasonable price

Even at $16 – I’d hit the 2007 Chateau de Lugagnac – I’d hit it like the fist of an angry God – just sayin..

LOL, is that good or bad?

$16 Great glass of awesome.

Dirty-cherry bombs, forest floor, black cherry, plum-sauce

Enjoying the lingering cocoa/plumy finish on this Lugagnac. Pleasant and I agree, it’ll improve w/time!

The Lugagnac is fairly simple in mouth to me. doesn’t seem to have varietal profile. dead mid palate. so so finish. sorry :(

seems like very low use of oak to me. I’d be surprised if any was new, which I’m fine with.

Seems as though they use just enough oak to get that ever so slight caramel note.

Winemaking notes are sparse. It’s all terroir, you know.

That’s not unusual for a French producer.

I do dig the 13.5% ABV on the first two wines :-)

Should be said, BTW, that Lugagnac avoids chems. other than sulphur. And fining is natural.

I could drink this while sitting in a red velvet chaise lounge, that’s what it reminds me of.

I’m getting a little mint and fennel

I’m enjoying the finish. It’s kind of fun and allows you to contemplate… ;-)

I’m really loving the 2008 Chateau de Lugagnac, more elegant than #1 and great with Savoie cheese :)

$16?

$16 for the Chateau de Lugagnac–any day–tastes more expensive.

A nice warm bowl of Lamb-strew w/ be off the hook with this

Getting wildly conflicting opinions on the Lugagnac. Hmm.

Indication of the wines complexity, bro :-)

getting gobs of dark tea in the mouth…

I met Michael Wangbickler early October last year at a tasting of Virginia wines when Frank Morgan, possibly the Virginia wine industry’s best ambassador, arranged the tasting for northern California online wine writers, bloggers, at the home of Marcy Gordon in Sebastopol in Sonoma County.

Michael works for Balzac Communications & Marketing, and he invited me to partake in a tasting of greener packaged premium box wines shortly after, and more recently has included me in tastings of wines from Bordeaux France.

Today, Friday, March 18, from 4:00 pm PT (7:00 pm EST) to 7:00 pm PT (10:00 pm EST), a group of wine bloggers will be tasting wines, all from the Bordeaux Supérieur AOC.

I know what you are thinking – at least 16,882,848 of you as of this moment anyway. You are thinking “It’s Friday, Friday, getting’ down on Friday, fun fun fun fun, we so excited, partyin’ partyin’ yeah we gonna have a ball today, gotta get down on Friday; nosin’ with my Chateau, sippin’ with my Chateau, gotta make my mind up, which wine can I taste?”

Answering that question, here is what is up for tonight:

  • Château La Gatte La Butte 2006 ($14.99 at KLwines.com)
  • Château de Parenchère Cuvée Raphaêl 2007 ($17.98 at WineChateau.com)
  • Château Penin Tradition 2008 ($20.99 at SeaGrapeWines.com)
  • Château de Lugagnac 2008 ($12.99 at KLwines.com)
  • Château de Terrefort-Quancard 2008 (couldn’t find it – yet)

Not being tasted: Costes de Château Féret-Lambert 2008, having arrived too late for shipping – I didn’t receive it, so I am guessing that is the case.

Today is my son Charlie’s 14th birthday, and we will be joining family an hour north of our Ukiah home, so I will not be tasting on time live with my fellow wine bloggers, but I will write the wines up as I taste them and post my reviews here or on facebook or on twitter.

That said, the tasting will be happening and you can follow along with the other 34 bloggers tasting by visiting
http://www.tastelive.com/planetbordeaux
.

The hashtag for the evening will be #PlanetBordeaux, so you can catch up on twitter as well.

I will confess a wry amusement at wanting to focus more on Mendocino County wines, while tasting wines from Virginia or Bordeaux but events like the sale of Fetzer to Concha y Toro and biblical rains delay tours and tastings with pretty pictures of more local wineries, and the UPS truck isn’t making stops at my house to drop off sample bottles of local Mendocino County wines for review, so I am grateful to folks like Frank Morgan and Mike Wangbickler, and happily taste and write up the wines of Virginia and the Planet-Bordeaux.com initiative.

Have a great weekend. Tomorrow is Saturday, Sunday comes afterward.

Disclosure: I am stunned at the viral explosiveness of Rebecca Black’s anthem Friday, and while acknowledging that it is horrible I must admit I enjoy it for all the same reasons I enjoy William Shatner’s acting and most of the singers on American Idol. Over the top cheesiness can be enormously entertaining when not taken seriously.

If you are not one of the many millions who are hip to the Friday meme, here’s a link:

 

Last week, I joined a dozen other wine writers to taste several wines from Virginia, and posted my tasting notes here.

One of the writers I met, Michael Wangbickler, invited me to a tasting tonight in Sonoma of Don Sebastiani & Sons’ showcase of their Pepperwood Grove wines, previously priced at around $9 for a 750ml bottle, now being released in environmentally friendly 3.0L box packaging for about $20.

The cost of producing one 3.0L box is less expensive than four 750ml glass bottles, and each unit sold is four times a previous single container purchase. Cost savings, and economy of scale discounting, allow a savings of about 44% from an already affordable wine purchase by volume. The Pepperwood Grove wines are being sold at a price comparable to $5 for a typical 750ml bottle. That works out to about 83¢ for a glass of wine.

Coincidentally, I worked as a campaign worker to help elect Don Sebastiani in his successful bid for the California Assembly in 1980.

Don, and his sons Donny and August created an international wine negociant company Don Sebastiani & Sons in 2001. Within three years, by 2004, they had launched a number of wine brands, including Pepperwood Grove, and by the end of that year the company has sold over 1 million cases of wine. In 2005, Wine Enthusiast magazine named Don Sebastiani & Sons “American Winemaker of the Year,” and in 2007 case production exceeded 2 million cases.

Pepperwood Grove wines available in 750ml glass bottles include Cabernet Sauvignon, Malbec, Merlot, Pinot Noir, Syrah, Zinfandel, Chardonnay, Pinot Grigio, Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc, and Viognier, made with varietal grapes sourced from California to South Eastern Australia, and Daunia, Italy to Mendoza, Argentina.

The first four wines Pepperwood Grove wines released in new “The Big Green Box”es are a California Pinot Grigio, Chardonnay and Old Vine Zinfandel, and a Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon with grapes from the Valle Central.

The Big Green Box Pepperwood Grove wines feature environmentally friendly packaging, touting 100% recyclability, energy savings, lighter weight fuel transport benefits, and sustainable forest sourced paper.

While the packaging makes clear that the box holds the equivalent volume of four 750ml bottles of wine, the compact nature of the box makes fitting two boxes of white wine side by side in the refrigerator much easier than trying to store 8 bottles of wine in twice the space.

Anyone familiar with wine in a box knows that the box contains a bag of wine and, as wine is dispensed from the bag, the bag deflates. Unlike wine bottles with oxidizing air trapped between the surface of the wine and the cork, boxed (bagged really) wines do not suffer a similar harm, and box wines can typically be served a month after opening without the typical turned wine experienced with opened and resealed bottled wine.

It really comes down to one question, “does the wine taste good?” I would love to find a tasty wine to recommend to friends to serve with food for family and friends, inexpensive enough to try and delicious enough to try again. The industry generally does a terrible job of marketing their product, and too many professional wine marketers, writers, and reviewers in complicit in that failure, making regular folks shy away from a beverage where too much has to be learned, known, understood, where only Frasier Crane and his brother feel comfortable.

I have friends, family, and readers who love hearing about traditionally bottled wines $30 and over, and I love tasting and sharing notes on these wines, many are incredible values and drink like wines costing $60-120. There are also many friends, family, and readers who will never buy a $30 bottle of wine, not even as a gift – but would take a chance on an affordable wine recommended by someone they trust.

I am thrilled beyond telling to be invited to taste some wines from a wine company, a Sonoma County wine family that “gets it.” Michael invited me, and other folks with a little wine influence, to taste wines that cost just 83¢ a glass together, live in Sonoma, or remotely via shipped wine samples and internet updated tasting notes.

A rising tide lifts all boats. More people drinking wine, whether 83¢ a glass or $10 a glass, means more grapes growing, more bottles and boxes sold, more ink and corks, bags and capsules, winemakers and social media marketing managers. I wouldn’t mind, on a personal level, a great inexpensive wine brand for cooking and food pairing. Saving money, and enjoying a new delicious wine, is always a welcome experience.

Here’s my tasting notes on tonight’s four wines:

The Big Green Box Pepperwood Grove California Pinot Grigio $20 3.0L Box – Clear pale golden straw color. Clean oak vanilla citrus and mineral nose. Flavors of balanced sweet and sour apple, lime, and melon. Medium bodied. Long, lingering citrusy dominant fruit finish. Much more flavor rich than some wine flavored water Pinot Grigios from Italy, but still light enough for folks looking for a lighter styled wine. Pair with clam, shrimp, crab, lobster, spring mix salads with Tres Classique lemon splash, a host of cheeses. This was my second favorite wine tasted, but my favorite white wine tasted.

The Big Green Box Pepperwood Grove California Chardonnay $20 3.0L Box - Clear pale white gold color. Nose of oak, toast, cream, vanilla. Not as much fruit as I was expecting, and much more lemon lime citrus instead of the almost absent but anticipated apple notes. Round. Smooth. Shorter, quickly dissipating finish. It would flavor some sauteed thyme onions nicely for the top of a homemade pizza, or be good as a base to a pasta cream sauce. Simple pairing: foil wrapped baked salmon.

The Big Green Box Pepperwood Grove California Old Vine Zinfandel $20 3.0L Box – Okay, even before I could guage the appearance of this wine, the aroma wafted up big and bold with chocolate, cocoa, and coffee notes. Explosively big rich forward nose. This is a pretty rich, deep, dark, and dense burgundy purple colored wine, blocking light, too dark to see through. Okay, now putting my big nose into the glass, and the bigness is confirmed. Tons of dark dusty chocolate powder, rich black raspberry and blackberry fruit, spice and earthiness. Round mouth, med full body, smooth, nice lush richness of fruit. Black berry, plum, cherry, chocolate, nice herbaceousness, sweetness balanced by nice acidity. Soft tannin, oak. Nicely integrated. Medium long finish. Would love to pair with venison, lamb, pork, almost any dish flavorful enough to match this big but accessible Zinfandel. This was my favorite of the four wines tasted.

The Big Green Box Pepperwood Grove Valle Central Cabernet Sauvignon $20 3.0L Box - Nice red purple color. Muted nose of oak. Oak follows through on mouth, dry spice and wood notes, berry fruit in background. Tannins noticeable on the medium long quickly tapering finish. Pair with Gorgonzola, portobello, and mushroom barbeque burgers and enjoy the Umami.

I opened the wines, and poured a glass of each so that they could breathe a bit in my glass, open up, and show their true character. Each benefited from a kiss of air.

All of the wines were non-vintage, which is fine by me. By being able to blend grapes from different places, harvested in different years, a consistent flavor profile at an affordable price is more easily achieved than in vineyard designated vintage wines.

The wines were uniformly approachable, oaked, smooth, and drinkable. I could have stood a little more fruit expression, but I am too old for subtlety – I’m just looking for a sexy wine bomb.

None of the wines tasted like $20-$30 bottles, but I thought they were all good value wines at $5 per 750ml, and I thought both the Old Vine Zinfandel and Pinot Grigio were particularly drinkable. I can see myself purchasing both and recommending them to anyone – I guess I started on the latter.

Thanks to Don Sebastiani & Sons winemaker Greg Kitchens, and Balzac Communications & Marketing guru Michael Wangbickler.

Disclosure: I received shipped wine samples, the equivalent of 16 regular bottles, enabling me to write this article with tasting notes.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,613 other followers